-
-
Registered members may receive e-mail updates on the subjects of their choice.
-
Imagining Interest in Political Thought: Origins of Economic Rationality
- Author(s): Stephen G. Engelmann
- Published: 2003
- Pages: 208
- Illustrations: 0
-
- Buy the ebook:
- Apple iBooks
- Barnes & Noble nook
-
- Acknowledgments ix
- 1. Introduction 1
- 2. Against the Usual Story 17
- 3. Virtuous Economies 35
- 4. Imagining Interest 48
- 5. State Rationality 77
- 6. The Public Interest 104
- 7. The Economic Polity 141
- Notes 151
- Index 185
-
"Engelmann extends our usual understanding of Bentham’s ‘felicitous calculus’ to the examination of the interplay between economic rationality and imagination in human conduct. . . . Imagining Interest fills in facets of the 18th century debate over economics and politics."—Ross B. Emmett, Review of Political Economy
"[F]ascinating. . . . Engelmann does not so much seek to evaluate the questionable concept of monistic interest as to show what it is and how it works. His stance throughout is that of a disinterested naturalist putting specimens of political ideology under the microscope for a closer look, in order to understand their origin and development. Everything considered, I think he succeeds."
—Max O. Hocutt, Canadian Journal of Political Science"Engelmann's text is an original and stimulating contribution to current debates over liberalism as individualism versus noeliberalism as economism."—Regenia Gagnier, Political Theory
-
"Engelmann extends our usual understanding of Bentham’s ‘felicitous calculus’ to the examination of the interplay between economic rationality and imagination in human conduct. . . . Imagining Interest fills in facets of the 18th century debate over economics and politics."—Ross B. Emmett, Review of Political Economy
"[F]ascinating. . . . Engelmann does not so much seek to evaluate the questionable concept of monistic interest as to show what it is and how it works. His stance throughout is that of a disinterested naturalist putting specimens of political ideology under the microscope for a closer look, in order to understand their origin and development. Everything considered, I think he succeeds."
—Max O. Hocutt, Canadian Journal of Political Science"Engelmann's text is an original and stimulating contribution to current debates over liberalism as individualism versus noeliberalism as economism."—Regenia Gagnier, Political Theory
Reviews
-
"Imagining Interest in Political Thought is an extremely impressive, powerful, and exciting work which casts important light on a crucial yet surprisingly neglected aspect of the history of political thought: the emergence of utilitarianism as a major political theory and its subversion of conceptions of natural law and civic humanism as the basis for social cooperation."—Philip Schofield, General Editor, The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham
Permission to Photocopy (coursepacks)
If you are requesting permission to photocopy material for classroom use, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at copyright.com;
If the Copyright Clearance Center cannot grant permission, you may request permission from our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).
Permission to Reprint
If you are requesting permission to reprint DUP material (journal or book selection) in another book or in any other format, contact our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).
Images/Art
Many images/art used in material copyrighted by Duke University Press are controlled, not by the Press, but by the owner of the image. Please check the credit line adjacent to the illustration, as well as the front and back matter of the book for a list of credits. You must obtain permission directly from the owner of the image. Occasionally, Duke University Press controls the rights to maps or other drawings. Please direct permission requests for these images to permissions@dukeupress.edu.
For book covers to accompany reviews, please contact the publicity department.Subsidiary Rights/Foreign Translations
If you're interested in a Duke University Press book for subsidiary rights/translations, please contact permissions@dukeupress.edu. Include the book title/author, rights sought, and estimated print run.
Disability Requests
Instructions for requesting an electronic text on behalf of a student with disabilities are available here.
Rights & Permissions Contact Information
- Email: permissions@dukeupress.edu
- Email contact for coursepacks: asstpermissions@dukeupress.edu
- Fax: 919-688-4574
- Mail:
Duke University Press
Rights and Permissions
905 W. Main Street
Suite 18B
Durham, NC 27701
For all requests please include:- 1. Author's name. If book has an editor that is different from the article author, include editor's name also.
- 2. Title of the journal article or book chapter and title of journal or title of book
- 3. Page numbers (if excerpting, provide specifics)
- For coursepacks, please also note: The number of copies requested, the school and professor requesting
- For reprints and subsidiary rights, please also note: Your volume title, publication date, publisher, print run, page count, rights sought
-
Description
Imagining Interest in Political Thought argues that monistic interest—or the shaping and coordination of different pursuits through imagined economies of self and public interest—constitutes the end and means of contemporary liberal government. The paradigmatic theorist of monistic interest is the English political philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), whose concept of utilitarianism calls for maximization of pleasure by both individuals and the state. Stephen G. Engelmann contends that commentators have too quickly dismissed Bentham’s philosophy as a crude materialism with antiliberal tendencies. He places Benthamite utilitarianism at the center of his account and, in so doing, reclaims Bentham for liberal political theory.
Tracing the development of monistic interest from its origins in Reformation political theory and theology through late-twentieth-century neoliberalism, Engelmann reconceptualizes the history of liberalism as consisting of phases in the history of monistic interest or economic government. He describes how monistic interest, as formulated by Bentham, is made up of the individual’s imagined expectations, which are constructed by the very regime that maximizes them. He asserts that this construction of interests is not the work of a self-serving manipulative state. Rather, the state, which is itself subject to strict economic regulation, is only one cluster of myriad "public" and "private" agencies that produce and coordinate expectations. In place of a liberal vision in which government appears only as a protector of the free pursuit of interest, Engelmann posits that the free pursuit of interest is itself a mode of government, one that deploys individual imagination and choice as its agents.
About The Author(s)
Stephen G. Engelmann is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
