Have you registered as a member of our site? Sign up today.
"Hartley exhibits a command of a wide range of literature relevant to contemporary critical studies. . . . Recommended." —J. M. Carvalho, Choice
"[Hartley] poses some important questions for radical criticism. . . ." —Malcolm Miles, Leonardo
“What is perhaps most admirable and valuable about The Abyss of Representation is focused attention, not to say the breadth of knowledge and the theoretical imagination, that Hartley brings to bear on his subject. . . . Hartley offers a comprehensive view of the thinkers in his purview, synthesizing a wide range of material with considerable insight.”—Sean Saraka, Politics and Culture
"Hartley exhibits a command of a wide range of literature relevant to contemporary critical studies. . . . Recommended." —J. M. Carvalho, Choice
"[Hartley] poses some important questions for radical criticism. . . ." —Malcolm Miles, Leonardo
“What is perhaps most admirable and valuable about The Abyss of Representation is focused attention, not to say the breadth of knowledge and the theoretical imagination, that Hartley brings to bear on his subject. . . . Hartley offers a comprehensive view of the thinkers in his purview, synthesizing a wide range of material with considerable insight.”—Sean Saraka, Politics and Culture
"The Abyss of Representation is an ambitious and highly illuminating book."—Ernesto Laclau
”The Abyss of Representation is an outstanding contribution to a theory of literature and aesthetic philosophy. It is a strong elaboration of the failure inherent in representation and that failure’s relevance to a cultural and political theory.”—Michael Bernard-Donals, coauthor of Between Witness and Testimony: The Holocaust and the Limits of Representation
If you are requesting permission to photocopy material for classroom use, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at copyright.com;
If the Copyright Clearance Center cannot grant permission, you may request permission from our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).
If you are requesting permission to reprint DUP material (journal or book selection) in another book or in any other format, contact our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).
Many images/art used in material copyrighted by Duke University Press are controlled, not by the Press, but by the owner of the image. Please check the credit line adjacent to the illustration, as well as the front and back matter of the book for a list of credits. You must obtain permission directly from the owner of the image. Occasionally, Duke University Press controls the rights to maps or other drawings. Please direct permission requests for these images to permissions@dukeupress.edu.
For book covers to accompany reviews, please contact the publicity department.
If you're interested in a Duke University Press book for subsidiary rights/translations, please contact permissions@dukeupress.edu. Include the book title/author, rights sought, and estimated print run.
Instructions for requesting an electronic text on behalf of a student with disabilities are available here.
From the Copernican revolution of Immanuel Kant to the cognitive mapping of Fredric Jameson to the postcolonial politics of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, representation has been posed as both indispensable and impossible. In his pathbreaking work, The Abyss of Representation, George Hartley traces the development of this impossible necessity from its German Idealist roots through Marxist theories of postmodernism, arguing that in this period of skepticism and globalization we are still grappling with issues brought forth during the age of romanticism and revolution. Hartley shows how the modern problem of representation—the inability of a figure to do justice to its object—still haunts today's postmodern philosophy and politics. He reveals the ways the sublime abyss that opened up in Idealist epistemology and aesthetics resurfaces in recent theories of ideology and subjectivity.
Hartley describes how modern theory from Kant through Lacan attempts to come to terms with the sublime limits of representation and how ideas developed with the Marxist tradition—such as Marx’s theory of value, Althusser’s theory of structural causality, or Zizek’s theory of ideological enjoyment—can be seen as variants of the sublime object. Representation, he argues, is ultimately a political problem. Whether that problem be a Marxist representation of global capitalism, a deconstructive representation of subaltern women, or a Chicano self-representation opposing Anglo-American images of Mexican Americans, it is only through this grappling with the negative, Hartley explains, that a Marxist theory of postmodernism can begin to address the challenges of global capitalism and resurgent imperialism.