• Inherent Vice: Bootleg Histories of Videotape and Copyright

    Author(s):
    Pages: 352
    Illustrations: 54 illustrations
    Sales/Territorial Rights: World
  • Cloth: $99.95 - In Stock
    978-0-8223-4353-0
  • Paperback: $27.95 - In Stock
    978-0-8223-4376-9
  • Quantity
  • Add To Bag
  • List of illustrations ix

    Preface ix

    Acknowledgments xxi

    Part I. Videotape and Copyright

    Introduction: The Aesthetics of Access 1

    Video Clip: Diasporic Asian Video Markets in Orange County 27

    1. Be Kind, Rewind: The Histories and Erotics of Home Video 33

    Video Clip: Chiller Theatre Toy, Model, and Film Expo 73

    2. The Fairest of Them All? Home Video, Copyright, and Fair Use 77

    Part II. Case Studies

    3. The Revolution Was Recorded: Vanderbilt Television News Archive, Copyright in Conflict, and the Making of TV History 115

    Video Clip: Experimental Film on Video: A Frameworks Debate 157

    4. Grainy Days and Mondays: Superstar and Bootleg Aesthetics 161

    Video Clip: Tape Art 191

    5. Joanie and Jackie and Everyone They Know: Video Chainletters as Feminist Community Network 195

    Epilogue: YouTube: Where Cultural Memory and Copyright Converge 225

    Timeline 245

    Notes 251

    Bibliography 287

    Index 311
  • Inherent Vice is a lively and perceptive look at the legal and social history of videotape, with an eye toward excavating the cultural antecedents of
    today’s ‘user-generated’ media. It would be well suited for courses on media studies and legal or cultural history, and would interest anyone with a curiosity about the folk culture of entertainment and technology in the late twentieth-century United States.”

    Inherent Vice is an eloquent and provocative account of the unique possibilities of the home video format, and will be of great interest to anyone studying media policy, new media and moving image history and aesthetics.”

    Inherent Vice is an interesting read for everyone who’s involved with (new) media studies; it reminded me to be aware of mediation, the possible differences in accessing media, the aesthetic value of a format and the importance of the preservation of cultural memory. First I focused more on the music industry when I studied copyright’s survival, but now video tape has opened my eyes to an important history that could possibly change the future access to media content.”

    Inherent Vice is not just a history of the labyrinth that is audiovisual copyright in the United States. It is an exploration of the tension between the top-down control of cultural products by their corporate producers and the (at times arguably) fair-use consumption and dissemination of these products. . . . Inherent Vice makes it clear that though the champions of access to audiovisual information have made many strides forward in the analog era, those champions must once more step up to the plate in the digital era.”

    “Hilderbrand not only successfully recuperates analog video to constructive ends, but he also provides a language with which to discuss it. Anyone interested in the relationships among institutions, the law, personal and cultural memory, and pleasure will be enriched by this work, while videophiles will be especially rewarded by the attentiveness it shows to the format they cherish.”

    “Hilderbrand’s book is broadly relevant to anthropologists for the attention it gives to textual appropriation’s subversive potential. This is not a new theme, but it is one that more anthropologists need to be reminded of in the context of contemporary debates over intellectual property and cultural appropriation.”

    “The salutary achievement of Lucas Hilderbrand’s Inherent Vice is to show that much of how we think about fair use today derives from debates over the rise of analog videotape in the 1970s and its widespread use in the 1980s and 1990s. . . . Hilderbrand’s case studies illuminate landmarks in videotape’s history of contesting copyright law to forge new repositories of memory, experience, and communication.”

    “Written from a critical-cultural perspective and tightly focused on medium specificity, copyright, and use and distribution, the book offers valuable methodological and historiographical contributions to a field of video scholarship significantly shaped by sociological, ethnographic, and industry-oriented methodologies.”

    Inherent Vice, with its blend of history and legal analysis, helps place video and videotape recorders in their rightful place in the history of copyright in the U.S. and provides food for thought and continued debate over the role of copyright in the digital revolution. It is an interesting read for scholars of law and culture.”

    “[A] sort of love song to the VCR—one much needed in this age of YouTube. . . . Hilderbrand presents a strong case that personal recording technologies (in both analog and digital forms) represent a crucial site for both political struggle and public action, even civil disobedience—implicitly warning that fair use is something that needs to be fought for or else it will be subsumed by copy-protection schemes and corporate enclosure.”

    “[A]n engaging, thoughtful, and thought-provoking work. . . . [T]his book . . . reveals that although a certain kind of video may be dead, it lives on in myriad related forms and remains vital to understanding our cultural identities.”

    “[An] intelligent, illuminating account of an understudied medium. . . . [I]f you, like me, are tired of having the same old present-minded conversation about illegal downloads, Hilderbrand will help change the terms of that conversation in productive ways by adding a layer of history too long ignored.”

    “Hilderbrand . . . takes on a complex tangle of cultural history, moving-image aesthetics, and copyright law. . . . The crucial issues are those of access and interactivity. . . . These are precisely the uses that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 was desgined to suppress. This book offers a persuasive argument that we should be moving in a very different direction.”

    "...Inherent Vice is a lively and perceptive look at the legal and social history of videotape, with an eye toward excavating the cultural antecedents of today’s 'user-generated' media. It would be well suited for courses on media studies and legal or cultural history, and would interest anyone with a curiosity about the folk culture of entertainment and technology in the late twentieth century United States."  

    Reviews

  • Inherent Vice is a lively and perceptive look at the legal and social history of videotape, with an eye toward excavating the cultural antecedents of
    today’s ‘user-generated’ media. It would be well suited for courses on media studies and legal or cultural history, and would interest anyone with a curiosity about the folk culture of entertainment and technology in the late twentieth-century United States.”

    Inherent Vice is an eloquent and provocative account of the unique possibilities of the home video format, and will be of great interest to anyone studying media policy, new media and moving image history and aesthetics.”

    Inherent Vice is an interesting read for everyone who’s involved with (new) media studies; it reminded me to be aware of mediation, the possible differences in accessing media, the aesthetic value of a format and the importance of the preservation of cultural memory. First I focused more on the music industry when I studied copyright’s survival, but now video tape has opened my eyes to an important history that could possibly change the future access to media content.”

    Inherent Vice is not just a history of the labyrinth that is audiovisual copyright in the United States. It is an exploration of the tension between the top-down control of cultural products by their corporate producers and the (at times arguably) fair-use consumption and dissemination of these products. . . . Inherent Vice makes it clear that though the champions of access to audiovisual information have made many strides forward in the analog era, those champions must once more step up to the plate in the digital era.”

    “Hilderbrand not only successfully recuperates analog video to constructive ends, but he also provides a language with which to discuss it. Anyone interested in the relationships among institutions, the law, personal and cultural memory, and pleasure will be enriched by this work, while videophiles will be especially rewarded by the attentiveness it shows to the format they cherish.”

    “Hilderbrand’s book is broadly relevant to anthropologists for the attention it gives to textual appropriation’s subversive potential. This is not a new theme, but it is one that more anthropologists need to be reminded of in the context of contemporary debates over intellectual property and cultural appropriation.”

    “The salutary achievement of Lucas Hilderbrand’s Inherent Vice is to show that much of how we think about fair use today derives from debates over the rise of analog videotape in the 1970s and its widespread use in the 1980s and 1990s. . . . Hilderbrand’s case studies illuminate landmarks in videotape’s history of contesting copyright law to forge new repositories of memory, experience, and communication.”

    “Written from a critical-cultural perspective and tightly focused on medium specificity, copyright, and use and distribution, the book offers valuable methodological and historiographical contributions to a field of video scholarship significantly shaped by sociological, ethnographic, and industry-oriented methodologies.”

    Inherent Vice, with its blend of history and legal analysis, helps place video and videotape recorders in their rightful place in the history of copyright in the U.S. and provides food for thought and continued debate over the role of copyright in the digital revolution. It is an interesting read for scholars of law and culture.”

    “[A] sort of love song to the VCR—one much needed in this age of YouTube. . . . Hilderbrand presents a strong case that personal recording technologies (in both analog and digital forms) represent a crucial site for both political struggle and public action, even civil disobedience—implicitly warning that fair use is something that needs to be fought for or else it will be subsumed by copy-protection schemes and corporate enclosure.”

    “[A]n engaging, thoughtful, and thought-provoking work. . . . [T]his book . . . reveals that although a certain kind of video may be dead, it lives on in myriad related forms and remains vital to understanding our cultural identities.”

    “[An] intelligent, illuminating account of an understudied medium. . . . [I]f you, like me, are tired of having the same old present-minded conversation about illegal downloads, Hilderbrand will help change the terms of that conversation in productive ways by adding a layer of history too long ignored.”

    “Hilderbrand . . . takes on a complex tangle of cultural history, moving-image aesthetics, and copyright law. . . . The crucial issues are those of access and interactivity. . . . These are precisely the uses that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 was desgined to suppress. This book offers a persuasive argument that we should be moving in a very different direction.”

    "...Inherent Vice is a lively and perceptive look at the legal and social history of videotape, with an eye toward excavating the cultural antecedents of today’s 'user-generated' media. It would be well suited for courses on media studies and legal or cultural history, and would interest anyone with a curiosity about the folk culture of entertainment and technology in the late twentieth century United States."  

  • Inherent Vice does more than anything else I’ve read to bring together aesthetic analysis and intellectual property studies. It offers a beautifully conceived historical study of the ‘medium specificity’ of videotape and an eloquent defense of video in a world populated by film aesthetes and digital utopians. I learned a lot from this book and it helped me to think in new ways about analog media.” — Jonathan Sterne, author of, The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction

    “By taking up the theme of analog videotape bootlegging in an era of aggressive digital rights management, Lucas Hilderbrand provides a timely and important window on the issues at stake in the creative commons movement. At the same time, he makes extremely interesting and valuable contributions to scholarship on the aesthetics of new media through his explorations of the affective dimensions of videotape, the implications of its ephemeral quality, and the interactivity its new technologies enabled.” — Timothy Lenoir, Kimberly J. Jenkins Chair of New Technologies and Society, Duke University

  • Permission to Photocopy (coursepacks)

    If you are requesting permission to photocopy material for classroom use, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at copyright.com;

    If the Copyright Clearance Center cannot grant permission, you may request permission from our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).

    Permission to Reprint

    If you are requesting permission to reprint DUP material (journal or book selection) in another book or in any other format, contact our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).

    Images/Art

    Many images/art used in material copyrighted by Duke University Press are controlled, not by the Press, but by the owner of the image. Please check the credit line adjacent to the illustration, as well as the front and back matter of the book for a list of credits. You must obtain permission directly from the owner of the image. Occasionally, Duke University Press controls the rights to maps or other drawings. Please direct permission requests for these images to permissions@dukeupress.edu.
    For book covers to accompany reviews, please contact the publicity department.

    Subsidiary Rights/Foreign Translations

    If you're interested in a Duke University Press book for subsidiary rights/translations, please contact permissions@dukeupress.edu. Include the book title/author, rights sought, and estimated print run.

    Disability Requests

    Instructions for requesting an electronic text on behalf of a student with disabilities are available here.

    Rights & Permissions Contact Information

    Email: permissions@dukeupress.edu
    Email contact for coursepacks: asstpermissions@dukeupress.edu
    Fax: 919-688-4574
    Mail:
    Duke University Press
    Rights and Permissions
    905 W. Main Street
    Suite 18B
    Durham, NC 27701

    For all requests please include:
    1. Author's name. If book has an editor that is different from the article author, include editor's name also.
    2. Title of the journal article or book chapter and title of journal or title of book
    3. Page numbers (if excerpting, provide specifics)
    For coursepacks, please also note: The number of copies requested, the school and professor requesting
    For reprints and subsidiary rights, please also note: Your volume title, publication date, publisher, print run, page count, rights sought
  • Description

    In an age of digital technology and renewed anxiety about media piracy, Inherent Vice revisits the recent analog past with an eye-opening exploration of the aesthetic and legal innovations of home video. Analog videotape was introduced to consumers as a blank format, essentially as a bootleg technology, for recording television without permission. The studios initially resisted VCRs and began legal action to oppose their marketing. In turn, U.S. courts controversially reinterpreted copyright law to protect users’ right to record, while content owners eventually developed ways to exploit the video market. Lucas Hilderbrand shows how videotape and fair use offer essential lessons relevant to contemporary progressive media policy.

    Videotape not only radically changed how audiences accessed the content they wanted and loved but also altered how they watched it. Hilderbrand develops an aesthetic theory of analog video, an “aesthetics of access” most boldly embodied by bootleg videos. He contends that the medium specificity of videotape becomes most apparent through repeated duplication, wear, and technical failure; video’s visible and audible degeneration signals its uses for legal transgressions and illicit pleasures. Bringing formal and cultural analysis into dialogue with industrial history and case law, Hilderbrand examines four decades of often overlooked histories of video recording, including the first network news archive, the underground circulation of Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story, a feminist tape-sharing network, and the phenomenally popular website YouTube. This book reveals the creative uses of videotape that have made essential content more accessible and expanded our understanding of copyright law. It is a politically provocative, unabashedly nostalgic ode to analog.

Explore More
Share

Create a reading list or add to an existing list. Sign-in or register now to continue.


Contact Us

  • Duke University Press
  • 905 W. Main St. Ste 18-B
  • Durham, NC 27701
  • U.S. phone (toll-free): 888-651-0122
  • International: 1-919-688-5134
  • orders@dukeupress.edu