• Men, Mobs, and Law: Anti-Lynching and Labor Defense in U.S. Radical History

    Author(s): Rebecca Hill
    Published: 2009
    Pages: 424
    Illustrations: 7 illustrations
    Sales/Territorial Rights: World
  • Cloth: $104.95 - In Stock
    978-0-8223-4257-1
  • Paperback: $29.95 - In Stock
    978-0-8223-4280-9
  • Quantity
  • Add To Bag
  • Acknowledgments ix

    Introduction 1

    1. John Brown: The Left's Great Man 27

    2. Haymarket 69

    3. Anti-Lynching and Labor Defense: Intersections and Contradictions 112

    4. No Wives or Family Encumber Them: Sacco and Vanzetti 162

    5. The Communist Party and the Defense Tradition from Scottsboro to the Rosenbergs 209

    6. Born Guilty: George Jackson and the Return of the Lumpen Hero 265

    Conclusion 315

    Notes 323

    Index 398
  • Men, Mobs, and Law is an important book that cuts across traditional lines of inquiry and analysis. Hill is to be commended for her creative use of historical evidence as well as cultural sources, including poems, novels, autobiographies, plays, and songs. Also impressive are her abilities to relate her topics to international issues and movements as well as to engage in theoretical and historiographical debates. . . . [T]he book makes a strong contribution to the study of American radicalism, the labor movement, the civil rights movement, and the law.” — Andrew E. Kersten, American Studies

    Men, Mobs, and Law provides an interesting and unique look at two major social justice campaigns in U.S. history. . . . I would highly recommend this book. It gives a great deal of historical information and provokes the reader to think about the commonalities of the labor defense and anti-lynching movements.” — Jennifer O’Neal-Watts, Labor Studies Journal

    “[A] provocative and innovative intellectual and cultural history of the labor defense campaign and the Left's most famous martyrs. . . . Hill offers an original thesis on the triumph of legal formalism that future historians of labor radicalism, antilynching, and prison reform must confront.” — David M. Anderson, Journal of American History

    “[A] rich and detailed account of the multiplicity, coalitions and divergences among the left in the United States in its resistance to lynching and in its labour defence campaigns. . . . [T]he book is compelling, analytically rich and detailed. . . . [N]o reader can walk away from the book without a sobering view of the power of the state in repressing, often violently, dissent which threatens its power along racial or class lines.” — Meghan A. Burke, Ethnic and Racial Studies

    “Brilliantly conceived, this book has much to offer. Very few studies of lynching match Hill’s creative scope. Examining lynching and opposition in the context of direct action is challenging and imaginative, asking questions historians should consider. . . . [T]his book should usefully provoke scholars into moving lynching scholarship closer to the center of the American history narrative.” — Christopher Waldrep, American Historical Review

    “Hill breaks new ground in her efforts to link labour defence and anti-lynching campaigns as part of a broader radical critique of American justice which lays bare the foundational hierarchies of the American state. . . . Men, Mobs and the Law offers a thoroughly original, insightful, and penetrating look into the ways in which bodies have functioned as sites of both resistance and oppression in American capitalism.” — Paul Lawrie, Labour/Le Travail

    “Hill has produced a useful study that should appeal to a wide range of scholars, not just radical and labour historians, but legal historians and sociologists interested in movement building.”
    — Bruce E. Baker, Left History

    “Hill’s study is bound by a tight theoretical framework and makes a convincing argument about the role of narrative construction and reconstruction in defense campaigns for those charged by the state with criminal activity. . . . She masterfully demonstrates the importance of common cultural beliefs and practices in framing labor and antilynching defense strategies. Although her case studies span over a hundred years, Hill’s ability to reveal the approaches that marginalized groups used to protect their own, and the emphasis on left-labor collaborations historically, are important contributions to the scholarly literature.” — Ashley M. Howard, Journal of African American History

    “It is not enough for U.S. radicals to read Men, Mobs, and Law; they should study it individually and in groups. They will find there the interplay of class, ethnicity, gender and race that explains over the course of American history, the outcome of movements that have sustained and advanced progressive agendas.” — Gerald Meyer, Solidarity

    “Rebecca Hill’s ambitious book highlights a major theme of American radical history. It brings together the history of labor defense campaigns with the concurrent movement to prevent the lynching of African Americans. In six individual studies from John Brown to the Black Panther Party, Hill achieves two notable goals: a substantive reinterpretation of these cases and a heightened recognition of their commonalities. . . . It is not enough for U.S. radicals to read Men, Mobs, and Law; they should study it individually and in groups. They will find there the interplay of class, ethnicity, gender and race that explains over the course of American history, the outcome of movements that have sustained and advanced progressive agendas.” — Gerald Meyer, Against the Current

    “This study will be required reading for all students of radical history, race relations, ethnicity, and the American legal system; it is certain to influence scholarly and popular understanding of social justice and the flaws of American popular democracy.” — James J. Lorence, Journal of Southern History

    Reviews

  • Men, Mobs, and Law is an important book that cuts across traditional lines of inquiry and analysis. Hill is to be commended for her creative use of historical evidence as well as cultural sources, including poems, novels, autobiographies, plays, and songs. Also impressive are her abilities to relate her topics to international issues and movements as well as to engage in theoretical and historiographical debates. . . . [T]he book makes a strong contribution to the study of American radicalism, the labor movement, the civil rights movement, and the law.” — Andrew E. Kersten, American Studies

    Men, Mobs, and Law provides an interesting and unique look at two major social justice campaigns in U.S. history. . . . I would highly recommend this book. It gives a great deal of historical information and provokes the reader to think about the commonalities of the labor defense and anti-lynching movements.” — Jennifer O’Neal-Watts, Labor Studies Journal

    “[A] provocative and innovative intellectual and cultural history of the labor defense campaign and the Left's most famous martyrs. . . . Hill offers an original thesis on the triumph of legal formalism that future historians of labor radicalism, antilynching, and prison reform must confront.” — David M. Anderson, Journal of American History

    “[A] rich and detailed account of the multiplicity, coalitions and divergences among the left in the United States in its resistance to lynching and in its labour defence campaigns. . . . [T]he book is compelling, analytically rich and detailed. . . . [N]o reader can walk away from the book without a sobering view of the power of the state in repressing, often violently, dissent which threatens its power along racial or class lines.” — Meghan A. Burke, Ethnic and Racial Studies

    “Brilliantly conceived, this book has much to offer. Very few studies of lynching match Hill’s creative scope. Examining lynching and opposition in the context of direct action is challenging and imaginative, asking questions historians should consider. . . . [T]his book should usefully provoke scholars into moving lynching scholarship closer to the center of the American history narrative.” — Christopher Waldrep, American Historical Review

    “Hill breaks new ground in her efforts to link labour defence and anti-lynching campaigns as part of a broader radical critique of American justice which lays bare the foundational hierarchies of the American state. . . . Men, Mobs and the Law offers a thoroughly original, insightful, and penetrating look into the ways in which bodies have functioned as sites of both resistance and oppression in American capitalism.” — Paul Lawrie, Labour/Le Travail

    “Hill has produced a useful study that should appeal to a wide range of scholars, not just radical and labour historians, but legal historians and sociologists interested in movement building.”
    — Bruce E. Baker, Left History

    “Hill’s study is bound by a tight theoretical framework and makes a convincing argument about the role of narrative construction and reconstruction in defense campaigns for those charged by the state with criminal activity. . . . She masterfully demonstrates the importance of common cultural beliefs and practices in framing labor and antilynching defense strategies. Although her case studies span over a hundred years, Hill’s ability to reveal the approaches that marginalized groups used to protect their own, and the emphasis on left-labor collaborations historically, are important contributions to the scholarly literature.” — Ashley M. Howard, Journal of African American History

    “It is not enough for U.S. radicals to read Men, Mobs, and Law; they should study it individually and in groups. They will find there the interplay of class, ethnicity, gender and race that explains over the course of American history, the outcome of movements that have sustained and advanced progressive agendas.” — Gerald Meyer, Solidarity

    “Rebecca Hill’s ambitious book highlights a major theme of American radical history. It brings together the history of labor defense campaigns with the concurrent movement to prevent the lynching of African Americans. In six individual studies from John Brown to the Black Panther Party, Hill achieves two notable goals: a substantive reinterpretation of these cases and a heightened recognition of their commonalities. . . . It is not enough for U.S. radicals to read Men, Mobs, and Law; they should study it individually and in groups. They will find there the interplay of class, ethnicity, gender and race that explains over the course of American history, the outcome of movements that have sustained and advanced progressive agendas.” — Gerald Meyer, Against the Current

    “This study will be required reading for all students of radical history, race relations, ethnicity, and the American legal system; it is certain to influence scholarly and popular understanding of social justice and the flaws of American popular democracy.” — James J. Lorence, Journal of Southern History

  • “‘Do you not understand your own language?’ David Walker famously asked white America. It is an enduring question for activists and scholars of the antiracist left, and one that Rebecca N. Hill engages in this imaginative and provocative study. Men, Mobs, and Law critically compares and connects a series of cases framed by state-sanctioned premature death to disentangle the rhetoric, strategy, and gendered racial politics of radical campaigns for justice that overlay deeper movements for social change.” — Ruth Wilson Gilmore, author of, Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California

    Men, Mobs, and Law is a brilliant work of scholarship. Rebecca N. Hill argues that anti-lynching and labor-defense movements represent two sides of the same coin, not simply because they share a concern for social justice, but because they embody a fundamental opposition between the mob and the state. Hill draws on the most sophisticated analyses of race, gender, class, history, politics, and literature to reorient our thinking about the meaning of ‘popular justice.’” — Robin D. G. Kelley, author of, Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination

    Men, Mobs, and Law is a terrific book, which will speak to wide readerships about the functioning of the state, the nature and complexity of movements that have challenged the state, and the problems that race and class pose for traditional conceptions of American democracy. The book is organized around dramatic cases. These are stories that many of us know well, but Rebecca N. Hill’s treatment of them is fresh, lively, richly detailed, and impassioned.” — Peter Rachleff, author of, Hard-Pressed in the Heartland: The Hormel Strike and the Future of the Labor Movement

  • Permission to Photocopy (coursepacks)

    If you are requesting permission to photocopy material for classroom use, please contact the Copyright Clearance Center at copyright.com;

    If the Copyright Clearance Center cannot grant permission, you may request permission from our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).

    Permission to Reprint

    If you are requesting permission to reprint DUP material (journal or book selection) in another book or in any other format, contact our Copyrights & Permissions Manager (use Contact Information listed below).

    Images/Art

    Many images/art used in material copyrighted by Duke University Press are controlled, not by the Press, but by the owner of the image. Please check the credit line adjacent to the illustration, as well as the front and back matter of the book for a list of credits. You must obtain permission directly from the owner of the image. Occasionally, Duke University Press controls the rights to maps or other drawings. Please direct permission requests for these images to permissions@dukeupress.edu.
    For book covers to accompany reviews, please contact the publicity department.

    Subsidiary Rights/Foreign Translations

    If you're interested in a Duke University Press book for subsidiary rights/translations, please contact permissions@dukeupress.edu. Include the book title/author, rights sought, and estimated print run.

    Disability Requests

    Instructions for requesting an electronic text on behalf of a student with disabilities are available here.

    Rights & Permissions Contact Information

    Email: permissions@dukeupress.edu
    Email contact for coursepacks: asstpermissions@dukeupress.edu
    Fax: 919-688-4574
    Mail:
    Duke University Press
    Rights and Permissions
    905 W. Main Street
    Suite 18B
    Durham, NC 27701

    For all requests please include:
    1. Author's name. If book has an editor that is different from the article author, include editor's name also.
    2. Title of the journal article or book chapter and title of journal or title of book
    3. Page numbers (if excerpting, provide specifics)
    For coursepacks, please also note: The number of copies requested, the school and professor requesting
    For reprints and subsidiary rights, please also note: Your volume title, publication date, publisher, print run, page count, rights sought
  • Description

    In Men, Mobs, and Law, Rebecca N. Hill compares two seemingly unrelated types of leftist protest campaigns: those intended to defend labor organizers from prosecution and those seeking to memorialize lynching victims and stop the practice of lynching. Arguing that these forms of protest are related and have substantially influenced one another, Hill points out that both worked to build alliances through appeals to public opinion in the media, by defining the American state as a force of terror, and by creating a heroic identity for their movements. Each has played a major role in the history of radical politics in the United States. Hill illuminates that history by considering the narratives produced during the abolitionist John Brown’s trials and execution, analyzing the defense of the Chicago anarchists of the Haymarket affair, and comparing Ida B. Wells’s and the NAACP’s anti-lynching campaigns to the Industrial Workers of the World’s early-twentieth-century defense campaigns. She also considers conflicts within the campaign to defend Sacco and Vanzetti, chronicles the history of the Communist Party’s International Labor Defense, and explores the Black Panther Party’s defense of George Jackson.

    As Hill explains, labor defense activists first drew on populist logic, opposing the masses to the state in their campaigns, while anti-lynching activists went in the opposite direction, castigating “the mob” and appealing to the law. Showing that this difference stems from the different positions of whites and Blacks in the American legal system, Hill’s comparison of anti-lynching organizing and radical labor defenses reveals the conflicts and intersections between antiracist struggle and socialism in the United States.

    About The Author(s)

    Rebecca N. Hill is Director of the American Studies Master of Arts Program and Associate Professor of History at Kennesaw State University.

Explore More
Share

Create a reading list or add to an existing list. Sign-in or register now to continue.


Contact Us

  • Duke University Press
  • 905 W. Main St. Ste 18-B
  • Durham, NC 27701
  • U.S. phone (toll-free): 888-651-0122
  • International: 1-919-688-5134
  • orders@dukeupress.edu